solar cell: be superior to solar cells

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.70
, technology
Weight: 0.66
, electronics
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings inverter
Weight: 0.36
, electric motor
Weight: 0.35
, antenna
Weight: 0.35
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be superior to solar cells of 1980s 1.00
be superior to solar cells 1.00
be superior to cells of 1980s 0.91
be superior to cells 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(solar cell, be superior to solar cells)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be superior to solar cells of 1980s)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be superior to cells of 1980s)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be superior to cells)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(solar cell, be superior to cells of 1980s)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(solar cell, be superior to solar cells of 1980s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(solar cell, be superior to cells)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(solar cell, be superior to cells)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solar cell, be superior to cells)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(solar cell, be superior to cells of 1980s)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(solar cell, be superior to solar cells of 1980s)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(solar cell, be superior to cells of 1980s)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(solar cell, be superior to solar cells of 1980s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solar cell, be superior to solar cells)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(solar cell, be superior to solar cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(solar cell, be superior to solar cells)