solar energy: be better than renewable energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents energy
Weight: 0.88
, resource
Weight: 0.67
, industry
Weight: 0.66
, light source
Weight: 0.65
Siblings thermal energy
Weight: 0.38
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.38
, wind
Weight: 0.37
, natural gas
Weight: 0.35
, light bulb
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than renewable energy 1.00
be better than other renewable energy 0.99
be better than non renewable energy 0.98
be better than other non renewable energy 0.97
be renewable energy 0.96
is renewable energy 0.96
be considered renewable energy 0.95
have considered renewable energy resources energy 0.94
is renewable energy resource 0.92
renewable source of energy 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, is renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(natural gas, is renewable energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, renewable source of energy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(solar energy, renewable source of energy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(solar energy, renewable source of energy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(solar energy, renewable source of energy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(natural gas, is renewable energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(energy, be better than other renewable energy)