solar energy: be expensive than energy

Related concepts

Parents	energy Weight: 0.88 , resource Weight: 0.67 , industry Weight: 0.66 , light source Weight: 0.65
Siblings	thermal energy Weight: 0.38 , kinetic energy Weight: 0.38 , wind Weight: 0.37 , natural gas Weight: 0.35 , light bulb Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive than energy	1.00
be better than other renewable energy	0.87
is better energy	0.87
be better than renewable energy	0.86
be energy	0.86
is energy	0.85
be better than other non renewable energy	0.85
be better than non renewable energy	0.84
have considered energy resources energy	0.84
be considered energy	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(natural gas, is energy)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(wind, is energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(energy, be better than other renewable energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(wind, is energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(wind, is energy)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(natural gas, is energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(natural gas, is energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(solar energy, be expensive than energy)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(solar energy, is energy)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(solar energy, be energy)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(solar energy, be considered energy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(solar energy, is energy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(solar energy, be energy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be energy)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(solar energy, be considered energy)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, is energy)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(solar energy, is energy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be considered energy)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(solar energy, be energy)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(solar energy, be considered energy)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than renewable energy)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(solar energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(energy, be better than other renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(natural gas, is energy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(wind, is energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.48

Typical(solar energy, be expensive than energy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(energy, be better than other renewable energy)