solar energy: be more developed in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents energy
Weight: 0.88
, resource
Weight: 0.67
, industry
Weight: 0.66
Siblings thermal energy
Weight: 0.38
, kinetic energy
Weight: 0.38
, wind
Weight: 0.37
, natural gas
Weight: 0.35
, light bulb
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more developed in india 1.00
be more developed in western india 0.95
be more important in india 0.92
be used in europe 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be more important in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(energy, be more important in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more developed in western india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(energy, be more important in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(energy, be more important in india)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(energy, be more developed in western india)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(solar energy, be more developed in india)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in western india)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(solar energy, be more developed in western india)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in western india)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more developed in western india)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more important in india)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(solar energy, be more important in india)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be more important in india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more important in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(energy, be more developed in western india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(energy, be more important in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(energy, be more developed in western india)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(solar energy, be more developed in india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(energy, be more important in india)