soldier: be at army

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents public servant
Weight: 0.68
, enemy
Weight: 0.64
, police officer
Weight: 0.63
, officer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings man
Weight: 0.68
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, medic
Weight: 0.61
, sergeant
Weight: 0.58
, gunner
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at army 1.00
be a part of army 0.97
be at military base 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(officer, be at military base)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(soldier, be at army)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(officer, be at military base)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(officer, be at military base)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(medic, be at military base)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(officer, be at military base)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(soldier, be at army)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(medic, be at military base)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(medic, be at military base)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(soldier, be at army)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(soldier, be a part of army)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(soldier, be a part of army)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(soldier, be a part of army)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(soldier, be a part of army)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, be at army)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(soldier, be at army)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(officer, be at military base)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(medic, be at military base)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(soldier, be at army)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(officer, be at military base)