soldier: wear berets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents enemy
Weight: 0.64
, police officer
Weight: 0.63
, officer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings man
Weight: 0.68
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, medic
Weight: 0.61
, special force
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear berets 1.00
wear striped shirts 0.84
wear uniforms 0.84
wear hats 0.84
wear shirts 0.83
wear hats instead of helmets 0.83
wear funny hats 0.82
wear helmets 0.81
wear camoflage 0.81
wear scarves 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soldier, wear berets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soldier, wear berets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear berets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear helmets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear hats)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear berets)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear berets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(special force, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(special force, wear berets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(special force, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(special force, wear hats)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(special force, wear helmets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(special force, wear helmets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(soldier, wear berets)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soldier, wear uniforms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soldier, wear uniforms)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear uniforms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear hats instead of helmets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear uniforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soldier, wear berets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(special force, wear hats)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(special force, wear berets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(special force, wear helmets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(police officer, wear uniforms)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(soldier, wear berets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)