solicitor: be in england wear wigs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
, lawyer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barrister
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.35
, landlord
Weight: 0.34
, accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in england wear wigs 1.00
wear wigs 0.91
wear black 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(attorney, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear wigs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(attorney, wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(attorney, wear wigs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear wigs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear black)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear black)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(solicitor, wear black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be in england wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(barrister, wear wigs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(attorney, wear wigs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear wigs)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(solicitor, be in england wear wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black)