solicitor: was general of india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
, lawyer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barrister
Weight: 0.63
, attorney
Weight: 0.35
, landlord
Weight: 0.34
, accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defendant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was general of india 1.00
is general 0.80
is uk 0.79
is general important 0.78
is expensive uk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(attorney, is general)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(landlord, is uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(attorney, is general) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(attorney, is general)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(landlord, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(landlord, is uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(attorney, is general important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(attorney, is general important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(solicitor, was general of india)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(solicitor, is general)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is general)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solicitor, is uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(solicitor, is general)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(solicitor, is uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(solicitor, is general important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(solicitor, is general important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is general important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is general important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is general)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(solicitor, is expensive uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solicitor, was general of india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(landlord, is uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(attorney, is general)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(attorney, is general important)