solid: be better conductors of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, liquid
Weight: 0.52
, material
Weight: 0.51
Siblings stick
Weight: 0.62
, silt
Weight: 0.55
, good
Weight: 0.33
, nice
Weight: 0.32
, good luck
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better conductors of heat 1.00
is better heat conductors than gas 0.96
is good conductors 0.92
is conductors 0.91
is good thermal conductors 0.89
have low heat capacity 0.75
conduct heat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(material, is conductors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(material, is conductors)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(material, is conductors)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(solid, be better conductors of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(solid, is good conductors)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(solid, is conductors)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(solid, is good thermal conductors)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(solid, is conductors)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(solid, is conductors)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(solid, is good conductors)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(solid, is good conductors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(solid, is good thermal conductors)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(solid, is good thermal conductors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(solid, have low heat capacity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(solid, have low heat capacity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(solid, have low heat capacity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(solid, conduct heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(solid, have low heat capacity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(solid, conduct heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(solid, conduct heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(solid, is conductors)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(solid, is good conductors)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(solid, is good thermal conductors)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(solid, conduct heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(solid, be better conductors of heat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(material, is conductors)