solidarity: be important to unions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, principle
Weight: 0.59
, movement
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.56
, theme
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compassion
Weight: 0.34
, unity
Weight: 0.34
, faith
Weight: 0.33
, patriotism
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to unions 1.00
was different from trade union federations 0.82
was different from other trade union federations 0.82
was different from other trade union federations in poland 0.80
was different from trade union federations in poland 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(solidarity, be important to unions)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from trade union federations in poland)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(solidarity, was different from other trade union federations in poland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(solidarity, be important to unions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(solidarity, be important to unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(solidarity, be important to unions)