solo: is bad movie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.53
, setting
Weight: 0.52
, duet
Weight: 0.51
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings guitar
Weight: 0.32
, recital
Weight: 0.30
, tour
Weight: 0.30
, concert
Weight: 0.30
, exhibition
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad movie 1.00
is movie 0.94
be in film 0.87
be important in films 0.82
do bad 0.79
sound bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(setting, be important in films) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(solo, is bad movie)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(setting, be in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(solo, is bad movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(setting, be in film)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(setting, be important in films)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(setting, be in film)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(setting, be important in films)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(concert, sound bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(setting, be in film) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(solo, is bad movie)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(setting, be important in films) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(solo, is bad movie)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(concert, sound bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(concert, sound bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(solo, is bad movie)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(solo, is movie)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(solo, is movie)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is movie)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(solo, is movie)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(solo, do bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(solo, do bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, do bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(solo, do bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is bad movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(solo, is bad movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(setting, be in film)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(setting, be important in films)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concert, sound bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(setting, be in film)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(solo, is bad movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(setting, be important in films)