solo: is terrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents album
Weight: 0.53
, setting
Weight: 0.52
, duet
Weight: 0.51
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings guitar
Weight: 0.32
, recital
Weight: 0.30
, tour
Weight: 0.30
, concert
Weight: 0.30
, exhibition
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible 1.00
is standard terrible 0.88
do bad 0.82
feel strange 0.77
has quality bad 0.77
is weird 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(solo, is terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(solo, is standard terrible)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(solo, is standard terrible)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, is standard terrible)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(solo, do bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(solo, do bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(solo, do bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(solo, is standard terrible)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(solo, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(solo, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(solo, do bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(solo, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(solo, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(solo, is weird)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(solo, is weird)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(solo, is weird)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(solo, is weird)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(solo, is terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(solo, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(solo, is terrible)