somalia: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	country Weight: 0.59 , nation Weight: 0.59 , state Weight: 0.58 , region Weight: 0.58 , place Weight: 0.55
Siblings	libya Weight: 0.35 , central african republic Weight: 0.35 , zambia Weight: 0.35 , kosovo Weight: 0.34 , zimbabwe Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
is poor	0.78
is poor country	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(somalia, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(somalia, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(libya, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(libya, is poor)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor country)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(kosovo, is poor)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(somalia, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(somalia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

Remarkable(libya, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(libya, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(kosovo, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(kosovo, is poor)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor country)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(libya, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(libya, is poor)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(central african republic, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(zambia, is poor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(zambia, is poor country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(somalia, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(somalia, is poor country)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(somalia, is poor country)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor country)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(somalia, is poor country)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(somalia, is poor)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(somalia, is poor)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(somalia, is poor)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(somalia, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(somalia, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(libya, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(kosovo, is poor)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(libya, is poor)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor country)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(zambia, is poor)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(zambia, is poor country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(somalia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(country, is poor)