somalian: have children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.38
Siblings programming language
Weight: 0.26
, english language
Weight: 0.26
, sign language
Weight: 0.26
, italian language
Weight: 0.25
, chinese language
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
have children 1.00
have many children 0.95
affect children 0.91
be important to children 's learning 0.87
be important for babies 0.81
be good for babies 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(sign language, be good for babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sign language, be important for babies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(sign language, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sign language, be good for babies)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sign language, be important for babies)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(sign language, be important for babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(somalian, have children)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(somalian, have many children)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(somalian, have many children)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(somalian, have many children)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(somalian, have many children)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(somalian, have children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(somalian, have children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sign language, be good for babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(somalian, have children)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sign language, be important for babies)