son: be preferred in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred in china 1.00
be preferred in india 0.82
be more important than daughter in china 0.78
be preferred over daughters in india 0.78
be valued more than daughters in china 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(son, be preferred in china)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred in india)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(son, be preferred in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred in india)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(son, be preferred in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(son, be preferred in china)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(son, be preferred in china)