son: be valued more than daughters in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valued more than daughters in china 1.00
be more important than daughter in china 0.91
be more important than daughters 0.88
is treated better than daughters 0.84
be more important than daughter 0.83
be preferred over daughters 0.81
were valued in society 0.81
be preferred over daughters in india 0.81
be preferred to daughters 0.80
get favored over daughters 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, get favored over daughters)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, get favored over daughters)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, get favored over daughters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be preferred over daughters in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughters)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, get favored over daughters)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(son, were valued in society)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(son, were valued in society)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(son, were valued in society)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(son, were valued in society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)