son: is treated better than daughters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.72
, young man
Weight: 0.71
, toddler
Weight: 0.68
, daughter
Weight: 0.68
Siblings henry
Weight: 0.58
, pulpit
Weight: 0.51
, mother
Weight: 0.40
, husband
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is treated better than daughters 1.00
be more important than daughters 0.93
be more important than daughter 0.88
be preferred to daughters 0.86
be preferred over daughters 0.85
get favored over daughters 0.85
be favored over daughters 0.84
be valued more than daughters in china 0.84
be called sons 0.83
be more important than daughter in china 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughters)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughters)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, get favored over daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, get favored over daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, get favored over daughters)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(son, be favored over daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(son, be favored over daughters)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, be favored over daughters)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(son, be more important than daughter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(son, be more important than daughter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(son, be more important than daughter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred to daughters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be preferred over daughters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(son, be valued more than daughters in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, get favored over daughters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughters)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, be favored over daughters)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter in china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(son, be called sons)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, be more important than daughter)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(son, be called sons)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(son, be called sons)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(son, be called sons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(son, is treated better than daughters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(son, is treated better than daughters)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(son, is treated better than daughters)