songbird: sing to his mate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variety
Weight: 0.52
, wild animal
Weight: 0.52
, character
Weight: 0.49
, animal
Weight: 0.46
, mammal
Weight: 0.45
Siblings owl
Weight: 0.32
, cougar
Weight: 0.32
, squirrel
Weight: 0.32
, rhino
Weight: 0.32
, frog
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
sing to his mate 1.00
mate 0.90
mate to produce offspring 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mammal, mate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(songbird, sing to his mate)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mammal, mate to produce offspring)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(songbird, sing to his mate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mammal, mate to produce offspring)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mammal, mate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mammal, mate)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(mammal, mate to produce offspring)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rhino, mate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cougar, mate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(frog, mate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mammal, mate)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(mammal, mate to produce offspring)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cougar, mate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cougar, mate)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(frog, mate)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(frog, mate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rhino, mate)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(rhino, mate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(songbird, sing to his mate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(songbird, sing to his mate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mammal, mate)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mammal, mate to produce offspring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rhino, mate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cougar, mate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(frog, mate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mammal, mate)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(songbird, sing to his mate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mammal, mate to produce offspring)