sorbet: be served between courses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.67
, ice cream
Weight: 0.44
, flavor
Weight: 0.43
, dish
Weight: 0.43
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.39
, flan
Weight: 0.38
, custard
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served between courses 1.00
be served 0.83
is served 0.82
be served at end 0.81
is served last 0.81
be served at end of meal 0.79
be typically served 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dessert, is served last) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sorbet, be served between courses)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dessert, be served at end of meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sorbet, be served between courses)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sorbet, be served between courses)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sorbet, be served between courses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served last)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served last)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end of meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, be typically served)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, be served)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(dessert, is served last) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dessert, is served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(dessert, be served at end of meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(fruit salad, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, be served)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fruit salad, be typically served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(sorbet, be served between courses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sorbet, be served between courses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dessert, is served last)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be served)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be typically served)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sorbet, be served between courses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dessert, is served last)