source code: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents source
Weight: 0.69
, software
Weight: 0.69
, programming language
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.68
Siblings javascript
Weight: 0.60
, asp
Weight: 0.58
, compiler
Weight: 0.55
, gpl
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
were bad 0.81
has quality evil 0.80
go bad 0.79
be considered bad 0.78
needs quality product 0.77
is quality product 0.77
is 3 bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(software, needs quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(software, needs quality product)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(software, is quality product)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(software, is quality product)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(software, needs quality product)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(javascript, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(javascript, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(javascript, be considered bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(compiler, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(gpl, is 3 bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(software, is quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(software, needs quality product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(compiler, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(compiler, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(javascript, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(javascript, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(javascript, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(javascript, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(gpl, is 3 bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(gpl, is 3 bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(javascript, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(javascript, be considered bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(source code, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(source code, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(compiler, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(javascript, be considered bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gpl, is 3 bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(software, needs quality product)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(source code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(software, is quality product)