south africa: is less developed

Related concepts

Parents	south korea Weight: 0.81 , africa Weight: 0.80 , south america Weight: 0.78 , latin america Weight: 0.73
Siblings	new zealand Weight: 0.69 , australia Weight: 0.66 , germany Weight: 0.65 , france Weight: 0.64 , south Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is less developed	1.00
is more developed	0.97
is developed	0.90
be regarded as developing country	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(south america, is less developed)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(south america, is developed)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(south america, is developed)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(france, is developed)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(australia, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(latin america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(south america, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(latin america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(australia, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(australia, is developed)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(france, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(france, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(south africa, is less developed)

Similarity expansion

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is more developed)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(south africa, is more developed)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(south africa, is more developed)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(south africa, is more developed)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(south africa, is developed)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(south africa, be regarded as developing country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(south america, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(france, is developed)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(australia, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(south africa, is less developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(south america, is developed)