south africa: was banned from cricket

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south korea
Weight: 0.81
, africa
Weight: 0.80
, south america
Weight: 0.78
, latin america
Weight: 0.73
Siblings new zealand
Weight: 0.69
, australia
Weight: 0.66
, germany
Weight: 0.65
, france
Weight: 0.64
, south
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
was banned from cricket 1.00
was banned in 1964 0.83
was banned from olympics 0.80
be afraid of rugby league 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(south africa, was banned from cricket)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was banned in 1964)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(south africa, was banned in 1964)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(south africa, was banned in 1964)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(south africa, be afraid of rugby league)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(south africa, be afraid of rugby league)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(south africa, be afraid of rugby league)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned in 1964)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned from olympics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(south africa, be afraid of rugby league)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was banned from cricket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(south africa, was banned from cricket)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(south africa, was banned from cricket)