south america: is less developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north america
Weight: 0.84
, latin america
Weight: 0.80
, central america
Weight: 0.78
, american
Weight: 0.73
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.78
, south korea
Weight: 0.77
, native american
Weight: 0.76
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less developed 1.00
is developed 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is less developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(latin america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(south america, is less developed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(latin america, is developed)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(south america, is less developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(south africa, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(south africa, is less developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(south america, is less developed)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south america, is developed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(south america, is developed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(south america, is developed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(south america, is developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(south america, is less developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(south africa, is less developed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, is less developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(south america, is less developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)