south park: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neighborhood
Weight: 0.70
, area
Weight: 0.68
, community
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings south
Weight: 0.38
, north
Weight: 0.38
, west
Weight: 0.38
, national park
Weight: 0.38
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(north, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(north, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(north, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(south park, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(south park, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(south park, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(south park, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(south park, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(north, has quality bad)