south pole: have ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hot spot
Weight: 0.61
, pole
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.58
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.86
, telephone pole
Weight: 0.39
, west point
Weight: 0.35
, south
Weight: 0.35
, west
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have ice 1.00
have more ice 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pole, have more ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(south pole, have ice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pole, have more ice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pole, have more ice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(pole, have more ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(south pole, have ice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(south pole, have ice)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(south pole, have more ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(south pole, have more ice)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(south pole, have more ice)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(south pole, have more ice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(south pole, have ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(south pole, have ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pole, have more ice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(south pole, have ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pole, have more ice)