soy: be bad for cancer patients

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.62
, protein
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.61
, source
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, soybean
Weight: 0.36
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36
, castor oil
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for cancer patients 1.00
protect against prostate cancer 0.85
be good for menopause 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cancer patients)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cancer patients)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(soy, be bad for cancer patients)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(soy, protect against prostate cancer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(soy, protect against prostate cancer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(soy, protect against prostate cancer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(soy, be good for menopause)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(soy, be good for menopause)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soy, be good for menopause)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(soy, protect against prostate cancer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(soy, be good for menopause)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soy, be bad for cancer patients)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(soy, be bad for cancer patients)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soy, be bad for cancer patients)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for cancer patients)