soy: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.62
, protein
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.61
, source
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings soy sauce
Weight: 0.37
, soybean
Weight: 0.36
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.36
, dairy product
Weight: 0.36
, castor oil
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97
has quality bad 0.81
has quality good 0.77
be bad for pcos 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(protein, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(protein, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(soy, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soy, have reputation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(soy, be bad for pcos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(soy, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(soy, be bad for pcos)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(soy, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(soy, be bad for pcos)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(soy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(soy, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(soy, be bad for pcos)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soy, have reputation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(soy, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soy, have reputation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soy, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(soy, have reputation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soy, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(soy, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soy, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(protein, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(soy, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(protein, has quality good)