space: affect design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents outer space
Weight: 0.69
, environment
Weight: 0.66
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
, empty space
Weight: 0.60
Siblings international space station
Weight: 0.81
, metric space
Weight: 0.76
, space station
Weight: 0.73
, living room
Weight: 0.72
, locker room
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect design 1.00
be important in web design 0.83
affect development 0.81
be important in architecture 0.79
affect business of organisation 0.76
affect business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(environment, affect development)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(space, affect design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(environment, affect development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(environment, affect development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(environment, affect development)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(space, affect design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(space, affect design)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(space, be important in architecture)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(space, be important in architecture)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(space, be important in architecture)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(space, be important in architecture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(space, affect design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(space, affect design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(environment, affect development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(space, affect design)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(environment, affect development)