spaghetti: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.62
, leftovers
Weight: 0.61
, dish
Weight: 0.59
, noodle
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pasta
Weight: 0.36
, soup
Weight: 0.36
, lasagna
Weight: 0.35
, ravioli
Weight: 0.35
, potato salad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is good for 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
is great 0.81
taste good 0.79
be in better 0.77
be bad for health 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(noodle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(leftovers, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(leftovers, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(leftovers, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(leftovers, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(leftovers, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(noodle, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(noodle, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(noodle, be bad for health)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(leftovers, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(noodle, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(soup, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(noodle, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(leftovers, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(leftovers, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(leftovers, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(noodle, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(noodle, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lasagna, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lasagna, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(soup, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(soup, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(spaghetti, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(spaghetti, has quality better)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(spaghetti, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spaghetti, taste good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spaghetti, taste good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lasagna, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soup, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leftovers, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(noodle, be bad for health)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(spaghetti, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(noodle, taste good)