spam: be bloody popular in hawaii

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, risk
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, mail
Weight: 0.32
, trojan
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bloody popular in hawaii 1.00
be in hawaii 0.85
be big in hawaii 0.84
be popular in guam 0.78
be popular in asia 0.76
be popular in south korea 0.76
be popular in korea 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(spam, be in hawaii)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spam, be in hawaii)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spam, be in hawaii)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spam, be big in hawaii)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(spam, be in hawaii)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in guam)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(spam, be big in hawaii)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in asia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(spam, be big in hawaii)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in guam)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in guam)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in asia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in asia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(spam, be big in hawaii)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in guam)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)