spam: be in hawaii

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, risk
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, mail
Weight: 0.32
, trojan
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hawaii 1.00
be big in hawaii 0.95
be bloody popular in hawaii 0.85
be delicacy in hawaii 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(spam, be in hawaii)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(spam, be big in hawaii)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(spam, be delicacy in hawaii)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(spam, be delicacy in hawaii)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(spam, be delicacy in hawaii)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spam, be big in hawaii)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(spam, be delicacy in hawaii)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(spam, be big in hawaii)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(spam, be big in hawaii)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(spam, be in hawaii)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spam, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spam, be in hawaii)