spam: be popular in asia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, risk
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, mail
Weight: 0.32
, trojan
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in asia 1.00
be popular in korea 0.83
be popular in south korea 0.83
be expensive in korea 0.78
be bloody popular in hawaii 0.76
be popular in guam 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in asia)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in korea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in korea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(spam, be popular in guam)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in guam)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in guam)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in korea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spam, be expensive in korea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in korea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in south korea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in guam)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(spam, be bloody popular in hawaii)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spam, be popular in asia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spam, be popular in asia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spam, be popular in asia)