:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
exist |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(criminal, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(spammer, exist)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(problem, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(spammer, exist)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(problem, exist)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(criminal, exist)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(criminal, exist)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(problem, exist)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(telemarketer, exist)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hacker, exist)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hacker, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hacker, exist)
Salient implies Plausible
0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(spammer, exist)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(spammer, exist)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(problem, exist)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(criminal, exist)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hacker, exist)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(telemarketer, exist)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(problem, exist)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(spammer, exist)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(criminal, exist)