speaker: be better than headphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.64
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, presentation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings president
Weight: 0.70
, bill gates
Weight: 0.61
, ceo
Weight: 0.59
, lecturer
Weight: 0.57
, presenter
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than headphones 1.00
be more engaging than headphones 0.89
be louder than car speakers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(speaker, be better than headphones)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(speaker, be more engaging than headphones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be more engaging than headphones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(speaker, be more engaging than headphones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(speaker, be more engaging than headphones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(speaker, be louder than car speakers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be louder than car speakers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(speaker, be louder than car speakers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(speaker, be louder than car speakers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be better than headphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(speaker, be better than headphones)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(speaker, be better than headphones)