speaking: be in language learning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents act
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, sound
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.35
, talk
Weight: 0.33
, spoke
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in language learning 1.00
using communication skills 0.77
using oral communication skills 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(speaking, be in language learning)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(speaking, using oral communication skills)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(speaking, using oral communication skills)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(speaking, using communication skills)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(speaking, using oral communication skills)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(speaking, using communication skills)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(speaking, using communication skills)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(speaking, using communication skills)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(speaking, using oral communication skills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(speaking, be in language learning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(speaking, be in language learning)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(speaking, be in language learning)