speaking: was important in rome

Related concepts

Parents	act Weight: 0.62 , thing Weight: 0.61 , sound Weight: 0.57 , word Weight: 0.56 , activity Weight: 0.55
Siblings	talking Weight: 0.35 , talk Weight: 0.33 , spoke Weight: 0.33 , talk show Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was important in rome	1.00
was important in ancient rome	0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(speaking, was important in rome)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(speaking, was important in ancient rome)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(speaking, was important in ancient rome)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(speaking, was important in ancient rome)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(speaking, was important in ancient rome)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(speaking, was important in rome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(speaking, was important in rome) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(speaking, was important in rome)