special force: have helmets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents force
Weight: 0.69
, police officer
Weight: 0.62
, soldier
Weight: 0.60
, unit
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
Siblings delta force
Weight: 0.75
, seal
Weight: 0.60
, navy
Weight: 0.60
, swat
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
have helmets 1.00
have different helmets 0.98
wear helmets 0.97
wear different helmets 0.96
wear hats 0.78
wear gloves 0.76
wear masks 0.76
wear berets 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(special force, have helmets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(police officer, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(special force, have helmets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(special force, have helmets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(police officer, wear gloves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(soldier, wear berets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear gloves)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(police officer, wear hats)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soldier, wear berets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(delta force, wear different helmets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(delta force, wear helmets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(police officer, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(special force, have helmets)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(police officer, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(special force, have helmets)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(soldier, wear berets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(special force, have helmets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(delta force, wear helmets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(delta force, wear helmets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(delta force, wear different helmets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(delta force, wear different helmets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(special force, have helmets)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(special force, have different helmets)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(special force, have different helmets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(special force, wear helmets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(special force, have different helmets)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(special force, wear different helmets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(special force, wear helmets)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(special force, wear different helmets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(special force, wear different helmets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(special force, wear helmets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(special force, have different helmets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear different helmets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear helmets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(special force, wear hats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(special force, wear hats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(special force, wear masks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(special force, wear gloves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(special force, wear hats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(special force, wear masks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(special force, wear gloves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(special force, wear berets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(special force, wear masks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(special force, wear berets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(special force, wear gloves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(special force, wear berets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear masks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear gloves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear hats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(special force, wear berets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(special force, have helmets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soldier, wear berets)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, wear gloves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(delta force, wear helmets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(delta force, wear different helmets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(police officer, wear hats)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(police officer, wear gloves)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(special force, have helmets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soldier, wear berets)