species: actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.75
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species 1.00
actually appear on lists of extinct species 0.96
come extinct 0.82
get extinct 0.82
is extinct 0.81
be extinct 0.81
go extinct 0.81
be when extinct 0.81
become extinct 0.81
extinct 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(creature, become extinct)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(creature, become extinct)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(creature, become extinct)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, go extinct)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is extinct)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(creature, become extinct)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is extinct)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is extinct)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, go extinct)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, go extinct)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, go extinct)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become extinct)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(species, become extinct)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(species, go extinct)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(species, become extinct)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(species, become extinct)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(species, go extinct)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(species, become extinct)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(species, become extinct)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(species, go extinct)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(species, become extinct)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(species, become extinct)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(creature, become extinct)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is extinct)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, go extinct)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(creature, become extinct)