species: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents endangered species
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.78
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.75
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00
be endangered 1.00
go endangered 0.96
become endangered 0.94
do become endangered 0.91
actually appear on lists of extinct species 0.79
be vulnerable to extinction 0.79
has state extinction 0.76
actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species 0.76
is extinct 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(endangered species, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is endangered)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(atlantic salmon, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is extinct)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(atlantic salmon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(atlantic salmon, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is extinct)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is extinct)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(species, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(species, be endangered)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(species, go endangered)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(species, be endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(species, become endangered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(species, go endangered)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(species, do become endangered)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(species, become endangered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(species, go endangered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, be endangered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(species, do become endangered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(species, go endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(species, be endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, become endangered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(species, do become endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become endangered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, do become endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(species, actually appear on compiled lists of extinct species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(endangered species, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is extinct)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(atlantic salmon, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(endangered species, is endangered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)