specification: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	document Weight: 0.62 , factor Weight: 0.61 , design Weight: 0.60 , documentation Weight: 0.60
Siblings	voltage Weight: 0.64 , api Weight: 0.45 , standard Weight: 0.35 , compatibility Weight: 0.34 , design pattern Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality better	0.94
has quality plus	0.84
has quality cost	0.82
is good thing	0.78
be considered good	0.77
has quality questions	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(design, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(specification, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(design, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(specification, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(design, be considered good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(design, be considered good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(api, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(api, has quality better)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(design, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(specification, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(design, be considered good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(specification, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(standard, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(standard, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(api, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(api, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(design pattern, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(api, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(api, has quality better)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(design pattern, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(design pattern, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(specification, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(specification, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(design, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(design, be considered good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(api, has quality better)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(api, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(design pattern, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(design, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(specification, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(design, be considered good)