specification: is design document

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, design
Weight: 0.60
, documentation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings voltage
Weight: 0.64
, api
Weight: 0.45
, standard
Weight: 0.35
, compatibility
Weight: 0.34
, design pattern
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is design document 1.00
is primary design document 0.94
use design process 0.83
be important for members of engineering design team 0.77
relate to fashion design 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(design, use design process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specification, is design document)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specification, is design document)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(design, use design process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(design, relate to fashion design)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(design, use design process)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for members of engineering design team)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(design, use design process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(specification, is design document)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(specification, is design document)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(standard, be important for members of engineering design team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for members of engineering design team)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(specification, is design document)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(specification, is primary design document)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(specification, is primary design document)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(specification, is primary design document)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(specification, is primary design document)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(specification, is design document)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(specification, is design document)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(design, use design process)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(design, relate to fashion design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(standard, be important for members of engineering design team)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(design, use design process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(specification, is design document) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(design, relate to fashion design)