spectrophotometer: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.69
, device
Weight: 0.55
, apparatus
Weight: 0.53
, equipment
Weight: 0.53
, detector
Weight: 0.49
Siblings colorimeter
Weight: 0.37
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.35
, calorimeter
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.35
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
become expensive 0.91
become more expensive 0.88
be more expensive than red 0.85
is inefficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(equipment, become more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(equipment, become expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(equipment, become expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(equipment, become more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(equipment, become expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(instrument, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(equipment, become more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(laser, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(equipment, become more expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(equipment, become expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(laser, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(laser, is more expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(laser, be more expensive than red)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(laser, be more expensive than red)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(spectrophotometer, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equipment, become expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(equipment, become more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(laser, is more expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(laser, be more expensive than red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equipment, become expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(spectrophotometer, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(equipment, become more expensive)