speech: be allowed in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed in canada 1.00
work in uk 0.81
be capital of australia 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(act, be capital of australia)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(speech, be allowed in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(act, be capital of australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(act, be capital of australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(address, work in uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(act, be capital of australia)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(speech, be allowed in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(address, work in uk)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(address, work in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(speech, be allowed in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(speech, be allowed in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(speech, be allowed in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(act, be capital of australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(address, work in uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(speech, be allowed in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(act, be capital of australia)