speech: be more important writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important writing 1.00
be important in business writing 0.92
is writing 0.92
writing 0.91
writing matter 0.88
writing process 0.86
is prior writing 0.83
is written 0.77
be important in life 0.77
be important in macbeth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, be important in business writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be more important writing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(act, writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be more important writing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(act, writing matter)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be more important writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(act, writing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(act, writing matter)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tone, be important in business writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(act, writing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(act, writing matter)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tone, be important in business writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, be important in business writing)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(act, writing)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(act, writing matter)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(speech, be more important writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(speech, be more important writing)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(speech, is writing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(speech, is writing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(speech, is writing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(speech, writing process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(speech, writing process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(speech, is written)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(speech, is writing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(speech, writing process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(speech, is written)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, is prior writing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(speech, writing process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(speech, is prior writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(speech, is prior writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(speech, is prior writing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(speech, be important in life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(speech, is written)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(speech, be important in life)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, is written)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(speech, be important in life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(speech, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(speech, be more important writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(act, writing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(act, writing matter)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tone, be important in business writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(soliloquy, be important in macbeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(act, writing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(act, writing matter)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(speech, be more important writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tone, be important in business writing)