speech: be processed in cell phone conversation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be processed in cell phone conversation 1.00
affect conversation 0.81
be detected on phone 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, affect conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tone, be detected on phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tone, be detected on phone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tone, affect conversation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tone, be detected on phone)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tone, affect conversation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tone, affect conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tone, be detected on phone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tone, affect conversation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tone, be detected on phone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(tone, affect conversation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(speech, be processed in cell phone conversation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tone, be detected on phone)