speech: has quality class

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality class 1.00
is required class 0.85
has quality good 0.82
has quality better 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
has quality worth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(act, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tone, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(lisp, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(lisp, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lisp, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(speech, has quality class)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(speech, is required class)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(speech, is required class)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(speech, is required class)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(speech, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(speech, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(speech, is required class)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(speech, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lisp, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soliloquy, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(soliloquy, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality class) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tone, has quality good)