speech: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
has quality class 0.82
CAN good 0.81
has quality function 0.78
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(act, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tone, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(lisp, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(tone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(act, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(lisp, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lisp, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(soliloquy, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(speech, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(speech, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(speech, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(speech, has quality class)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lisp, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soliloquy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(soliloquy, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(soliloquy, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(act, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(speech, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tone, has quality good)