speech: is required class

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tone
Weight: 0.64
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, act
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sermon
Weight: 0.62
, address
Weight: 0.61
, lisp
Weight: 0.49
, soliloquy
Weight: 0.38
, remark
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is required class 1.00
is required 0.89
has quality class 0.85
be required at college 0.83
is needed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(soliloquy, is needed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(address, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(address, is needed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(address, is needed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(soliloquy, is needed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(soliloquy, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(speech, is required class)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(speech, be required at college)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speech, has quality class)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(speech, be required at college)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(speech, has quality class)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(speech, be required at college)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(speech, has quality class)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(speech, be required at college)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(speech, has quality class)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(speech, is required class)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(speech, is required class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(address, is needed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(speech, is required class)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(soliloquy, is needed)