speed: be computed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.70
, ability
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, trot
Weight: 0.34
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33
, frequency
Weight: 0.33
, patience
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be computed 1.00
be calculated 0.87
be dominant in calculation 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be calculated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be calculated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be dominant in calculation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(accuracy, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be calculated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(frequency, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(frequency, be calculated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(accuracy, be dominant in calculation)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be dominant in calculation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(speed, be computed)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(speed, be calculated)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(speed, be calculated)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(speed, be calculated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(speed, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(speed, be computed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(speed, be computed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(accuracy, be calculated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(frequency, be calculated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(speed, be computed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(accuracy, be dominant in calculation)