spending: be on space

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, bill
Weight: 0.58
, behavior
Weight: 0.58
, policy
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.34
, dollar bill
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, appropriation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on space 1.00
be on space necessary 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(spending, be on space)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(spending, be on space necessary)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(spending, be on space necessary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(spending, be on space necessary)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(spending, be on space necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(spending, be on space)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(spending, be on space)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(spending, be on space)